Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates
📽️ Media
|
Featured picture candidates Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for featured pictures are listed in the log pages and in the candidate archives. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, PDFs, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. AI-generated imagesEntirely or substantially AI-generated images are not eligible for featured picture status. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Adding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate name, quality, image description, categories and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Nominations are time-sensitive and for one-time use only. An automatic clock starts as soon as they are created. Do not create them in advance, save them for later or re-activate them. Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using
An 'Alternative' is created by adding a sub-section to the nomination page: ====Alternative==== VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 100 constructive, stable edits on Commons (excluding user and talk pages) can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions (“alternatives”) of the image as well as delist-and-replace nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Hint: Until summer 2025, the bot was also not able to process FPXed, FPDed and withdrawn nominations as well as delist nominations; this has been fixed, users do not need to close such nominations anymore. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
| |||||||||||||||||||
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2026 at 12:07:51 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Exteriors
Info created by StonesThatRemember – uploaded by StonesThatRemember – nominated by StonesThatRemember -- StonesThatRemember (talk) 12:07, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- StonesThatRemember (talk) 12:07, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2026 at 11:43:26 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Diptera#Family : Tabanidae (Horse Flies)
Info A female horse fly (Tabanus eggerii), taken at Porto Covo, Portugal. Female horseflies bite humans and have blade-like mouthparts that cut the skin open to make the blood pool so they can lap it up. Although they prefer big mammals, be careful!... All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:43, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:43, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2026 at 05:02:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Rosales#Family : Rosaceae
Info Poisonous fruits of a (Cotoneaster). Focus stack of 22 photos. (Durchmesser der Beeren ~6 mm.)
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:02, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:02, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 05:29, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 06:59, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support TheNoob1337 (talk) 09:11, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 14:37, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 16:34, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Replica of Aisawan Thipphaya - Art Pavilion in Muang Boran
Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2026 at 04:37:07 (UTC)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page
-
Front Elevation of Aisawan Thipphaya-Art Pavilion
-
Side Elevation of Aisawan Thipphaya-Art Pavilion
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Palaces#Thailand
Info created, uploaded & nominated by iMahesh (talk) 04:37, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- iMahesh (talk) 04:37, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support TheNoob1337 (talk) 09:12, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 14:38, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2026 at 00:47:34 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Domestic dogs
Info created and uploaded by dllu – nominated by me —brainandforce [yap] 00:47, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support no Samoyed FPs yet, but I think this is worthy of being the first! —brainandforce [yap] 00:47, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support TheNoob1337 (talk) 09:13, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2026 at 19:08:11 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Paris
Info Stoup of the Basilica of the Sacred Heart of Montmartre, Paris, France. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 19:08, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:08, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Very nice capture of a dynamic image. The top edge of the arch could be sharpened a little. --JayCubby (talk) 22:14, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 05:30, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --iMahesh (talk) 06:07, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support as per Jay. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:47, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 06:58, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
SupportLuc Viatour (talk) 10:41, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry but there is too much noise, a strange effect on the reflection on the column and ca around the lights. --Berthold Werner (talk)
Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2026 at 18:08:34 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Coraciiformes#Family_:_Meropidae_(Bee-eaters)
Info created and uploaded by Sven Damerow – nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 18:08, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:08, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Wow! Luc Viatour (talk) 20:16, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 22:58, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Strong support What a shot, and a solid description to back it up. —brainandforce [yap] 00:49, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 02:42, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 05:31, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Very impressive! -- Radomianin (talk) 06:45, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support. · · · 🌸 Rachmat04 · 🍵 10:21, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 13:15, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:19, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Great shot. A question for the nature photographers: help me understand how we have so very many spectacular FPs of bee-eaters? They are colorful, yes, but so are many other families. Are they especially abundant and/or cooperative in their range? Behaviorally, my understanding is they're pretty similar to flycatchers. Flycatchers are much easier to photograph than, say, warblers (so much time trying to photograph tiny colorful birds constantly moving in dense foliage!), but most flycatchers I come across are quite skittish around humans (plenty of exceptions, of course). Pinging Giles Laurent and Charlesjsharp, who if I recall correctly have taken many of our existing FPs. — Rhododendrites talk | 16:33, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2026 at 15:33:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes#
Info A Critically Endangered species. One FP from 2010. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:33, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:33, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 16:12, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 02:43, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 05:31, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Luc Viatour (talk) 10:41, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2026 at 15:09:13 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Containers
Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:09, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:09, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 18:50, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2026 at 14:49:11 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family_:_Ocypodidae_(Ghost_Crabs_and_Fiddler_Crabs)
Info Atlantic sand fiddler crab (Leptuca pugilator), likely female based on claw size, eating by its burrow. Thought about nominating this one or this one, but I like the framing with the burrow. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 14:49, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 14:49, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 16:11, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 13:15, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2026 at 14:45:21 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Cypraeidae
Info created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 14:45, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 14:45, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 18:16, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Luc Viatour (talk) 10:40, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 13:15, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:17, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2026 at 14:44:36 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#North Macedonia
Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:44, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:44, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Comment I believe shooting from farther away or standing higher with a longer focal length would make the subject’s proportion looks more natural. -- Apan (talk) 07:37, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
- @Chen-Pan Liao: I wanted to shoot from a position as farther away as possible, but this was the optimal one in the given conditions. The problem is that the church is located on a small elevated plateau, so moving backwards would mean going downhill. I'll try to correct the converging verticals so that it looks more natural. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:39, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Done I've uploaded a new version with corrected converging verticals. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:36, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 13:15, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:17, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2026 at 13:42:26 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Thailand
Info created, uploaded & nominated by kallerna —kallerna (talk) 13:42, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support A view of Hin Tha Toh on Koh Tao, Thailand, where dramatic rock formations meet the tropical sea. —kallerna (talk) 13:42, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on Fri, 11 Sep 2026 11:53:45 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures indoors
Info My own work. --Wilfredor (talk) 11:53, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 11:53, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 13:46, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I don't think this frontal view, taken from below makes full justice to this impressive sculpture. The statue also lacks contrast especially in front of this background. Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:37, 2 September 2026 (UTC) -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:37, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support The base is integral to the original sculpture's location, and is seen from below as it appears to have been the creator's intention, and as the Louvre has placed it at the head of a flight of stairs. The background is what's there in the Louvre. The contrast between the sculpted form and the unsculpted stone behind is enough. Acroterion (talk) 17:24, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Alt version
Info Based on Alvesgaspar comment --Wilfredor (talk) 18:53, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Also fine. Yann (talk) 19:31, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2026 at 06:46:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#North Macedonia
Info Small basilica in Heraclea Lyncestis, setlement under Phillip II, father od Alexander the Great, Macedonia.-- Mile (talk) 06:46, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Mile (talk) 06:46, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Одлично и доста инструктивно. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:30, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Oppose High quality photo, little magic. Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:39, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2026 at 03:02:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Traditions
Info created by Unknown author – uploaded by Abo Yemen – nominated by ★ -- ★ 03:02, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- ★ 03:02, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 14:07, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Can't see anything special in this photo, and the subject is not clear. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:40, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
- It is just Muslim praying in the holiest place in the Islamic world… ★ 23:00, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose Thank you for nominating this culturally significant and useful photo, but the composition apart from the people does not, to me, have the "wow' expected at FPC. — Rhododendrites talk | 16:39, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2026 at 01:35:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: [[Commons:Featured pictures/<add the gallery#page section here>]] (no idea which category to add)
Info created and uploaded by SinanDira – nominated by ★ -- ★ 01:35, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- ★ 01:35, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support I propose FP gallery Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural#Jordan --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:27, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:29, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Funny picture, quality so-so. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:43, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2026 at 21:09:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Germany
Info all by me -- Tuxyso (talk) 21:09, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Info Pulpit altar with organ in the Protestant church of St. George, Hattingen, Germany. A characteristic example of a classicist Kanzelaltar — the Protestant arrangement stacking altar, pulpit and organ on a single vertical axis, created here during the radical rebuilding of the medieval church in 1807–1810. The organ was built 1826–1830 by Christian Roetzel and restored in 2014; the altar painting shows the twelve-year-old Jesus in the Temple after Heinrich Hofmann. Above the case runs the inscription "Singet und spielet dem Herrn in eurem Herzen" ("Sing and make music to the Lord in your heart", Eph. 5:19)
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 21:09, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 14:41, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Good quality but not exceptional. The glare in the painting is a minus point. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:45, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2026 at 20:58:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Germany
Info created by Lvova – uploaded by Lvova – nominated by Lvova -- Анастасия Львоваru/en 20:58, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Анастасия Львоваru/en 20:58, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Unbalanced composition and unexceptional subject in my view, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:25, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Weak support The composition makes the most of the gas pipeline with its impressive curves, which also nicely frame the building in the background. The slight unbalance could be improved by cropping ca. 460 pixels from the bottom, so that the gaps between the slabs meet at the bottom-right corner. Technical quality is decent, good for a smartphone and without extreme oversharpening etc. I just regret that the tree has been cut at the top, but this was probably hard to avoid. – Aristeas (talk) 09:19, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you; cropped a little. Анастасия Львоваru/en 16:06, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support TheNoob1337 (talk) 12:57, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support. Impressive curves and rust aestetics are portrayed very well. —Rave (talk) 16:13, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Oppose No magic, sorry! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 17:56, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
- Exactly, it is technique. Анастасия Львоваru/en 17:59, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support There is nothing special about this object itself, but I always like it when someone finds beauty in ordinary objects and tries to convey it through photography. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:08, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Quality is just okay for QI, too generous bottom crop, OVERCAT (a classic...). --A.Savin 09:29, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Have to agree with the other opposers, sorry. An interesting rather than exceptional photograph. BigDom (talk) 13:02, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2026 at 20:56:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo_techniques/Styles_and_Techniques#Abstract
Info all by me -- Tuxyso (talk) 20:56, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Info Rusty sheet pile wall at the historic harbour of Carolinensiel - Morning light brings out three contrasts: cold–warm between the bluish-black wall segment and the rust-orange piles; the railing's diagonal shadow grid across the vertical piles, ending in a shadow self-portrait of the photographer; and faint wave reflections casting moving light onto the static steel.
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 20:56, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Oppose It's too clear that the silhouette is the photographer's. Quite a common capture, in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:30, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review, Basile Morin. In the case here it was purely intentional to place myself at the end of shadow of the railing and barely over the water on the red metal surface - see also image description and nomination text. I made multiple attempts to fit my own shadow in a pleasing way here. Tuxyso (talk) 03:53, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support For me, the plan has succeeded.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:08, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 07:56, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I'm with Basile. Not special enough even without the shadow of the photographer. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:47, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 18:52, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2026 at 18:36:23 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera/Lycaenidae#Genus : Talicada
Info created by Anitava Roy – uploaded by Anitava Roy – nominated by Anitava Roy -- Anitava Roy (talk) 18:36, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Anitava Roy (talk) 18:36, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Comment @Anitava Roy there is a dust spot on his antena. Mile (talk) 03:33, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
- The dark spot on the proboscis may be related to movement/blur due to the surprisingly low shutter speed. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:22, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, but the FP bar of butterflies is higher than this. Composition is very nice Sharpness should be better. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:49, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2026 at 09:08:00 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Dead_plants
Info Evocative knot in driftwood. Converted to monochrome using Adobe Lightroom. Created by Tagooty – uploaded by Tagooty – nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 09:08, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 09:08, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Wow! - excellent composition and beautiful textures. The b/w treatment works perfectly here - very striking! -- Radomianin (talk) 10:25, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:25, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Of course! I like the creepy component! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:29, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 12:58, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
SupportLuc Viatour (talk) 17:35, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 18:28, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Inspiring shape! Nice for the soul to evade -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support per anderen --Famberhorst (talk) 05:05, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 07:23, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Красный wanna talk? 08:10, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:16, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 09:28, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 13:48, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 18:51, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:04, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 05:32, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2026 at 07:53:38 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Ships
Info Russian cruiser Aurora on Petrogradskaya embankment harbor to Saint Petersburg .- Russia created by Pierre André - uploaded by Pierre André - nominated by Pierre André Leclercq. --Pierre André (talk) 07:53, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Pierre André (talk) 07:53, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice perspective frame and beautiful definition for a 2012 photograph --JackyM59 (talk) 08:16, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 10:06, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Comment Light is not so favourite. Would bet Exif isn't set. Hard light. Mile (talk) 10:22, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support 17:36, 1 September 2026 (UTC)Luc Viatour (talk)
Support per JackyM59.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:02, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 07:22, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:17, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support I love the fact that author have managed to capture the cruiser without the disturbing hotel building (the one with "Samsung" on it here) behind it. Glass one (Aurora residential complex) somehow looks not so disturbing as "Samsung" would be. Красный wanna talk? 08:18, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 09:56, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Comment This is too blue, white balance should be adjusted. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:05, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Oppose It's good, but hardly among the very best "Aurora" photos, sorry. --A.Savin 09:33, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2026 at 06:01:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#North Macedonia
Info Officer's Home in Bitola, Macedonia. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 06:01, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Mile (talk) 06:01, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 08:17, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:01, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Comment Perspective correction necessary --Llez (talk) 07:21, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Comment @Llez Good, which side ? Lamps or walls ? Somehow you will spoil one even further. Maybe to leave as it is, its drone shot. Mile (talk) 08:31, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Info Both. I did it for you. you can see the result here and download it, if you want. --Llez (talk) 09:55, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:28, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Distorted verticals. Inevitable dynamic range limitations of a drone camera at nighttime. Poor categorization. --A.Savin 09:39, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2026 at 05:10:35 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Nebulae
Info M27, the Dumbbell Nebula (Planetary Nebula) — the end of life of a solar-mass star. created by Luc Viatour (talk) 05:10, 1 September 2026 (UTC) – uploaded by Luc Viatour (talk) 05:10, 1 September 2026 (UTC) – nominated by Lviatour
Support -- Luc Viatour (talk) 05:10, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 08:17, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 07:20, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support An especially beautiful image of a nebula, and I really like the composition (not centered, as so many astronomy images, but with more space around the nebula). – Aristeas (talk) 09:23, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks Luc Viatour (talk) 11:02, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:47, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 09:57, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 13:50, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:28, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:33, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 05:32, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2026 at 03:50:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Daphniidae
Info A water flea of the genus Simocephalus from a town pond in Rakvere, Estonia, in lateral view. Taken under a microscope with an 8x objective in reflected light; focus stack of 77 exposures. created by Janeklass – uploaded by Janeklass – nominated by Janeklass -- Janeklass (talk) 03:50, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Janeklass (talk) 03:50, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support great! Luc Viatour (talk) 04:31, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 08:18, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 12:59, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:34, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 07:19, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:19, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:47, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 09:57, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 13:51, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 14:06, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:28, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support ---- Jakubhal 14:41, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Impressive macro photo of a weird creature! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:52, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 05:32, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Great macro shot, an obvious support for me, but why all the empty space at the bottom? BigDom (talk) 14:03, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2026 at 21:09:49 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Arenaria (Scolopacidae)
Info Ruddy turnstone (Arenaria interpres), still mostly in breeding plumage. Rare for me to see them up close. This one was feasting on horseshoe crab eggs. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 21:09, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 21:09, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Luc Viatour (talk) 07:31, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 08:18, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Comment The linked FP gallery Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Arenaria does not exist. Is Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Family_:_Scolopacidae_(Typical_Waders) the correct gallery? --Tagooty (talk) 09:13, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
- I have corrected the link to the genus where we have two current FPs. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:31, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks. Not sure how I got it wrong. :) — Rhododendrites talk | 13:23, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
- I have corrected the link to the genus where we have two current FPs. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:31, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:28, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:03, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support A little boost in exposure and shadows would be nice I believe. -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 05:35, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2026 at 20:27:38 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Single stained glass windows
Info artwork by sisters Jitka and Květa Válovy, photo & uploaded by Petr Vodička – nominated by Draceane — Draceane talkcontrib. 20:27, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice shot of an abstract artwork. — Draceane talkcontrib. 20:27, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Support — Kacir (talk) 22:17, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Support JAn Dudík (talk) 11:14, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Neutral for me. I really like the pattern, so I don't want to oppose. The lower part is darker due to the surroundings outside the likely ground-level window (possibly shadows from another building), resulting in uneven illumination. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:28, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I also like the abstract pattern but illumination is really not ideal. Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:54, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2026 at 18:25:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Kazakhstan
Info created & uploaded by Максат79 – nominated by me -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 18:25, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 18:25, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Beautifully diverse features – Julian Lupyan (talk) 19:56, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Maryliflower (talk) 06:09, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Luc Viatour (talk) 06:49, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 08:19, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Striking patterns in the canyon and clouds. Sharpness could be better. --Tagooty (talk) 09:16, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:27, 1 September 2026 (UTC)This is an impressive place and a very good composition, which deserves a more complete descrition. In particular, please explain what the white rocks are, as they don't look like limestone. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:16, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Neutral for now. - I've never been there, I don't have any special knowledge of geology, and I haven't found any Wiki articles about this place. I can only offer you a guide article in English, which tells you some basic things about this place. Sorry. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 20:11, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
- These are predominantly variegated clays, including white ones. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 10:47, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support That is enough, thank you. Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:30, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Mile (talk) 03:35, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:00, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 07:17, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:20, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 09:57, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Красный wanna talk? 14:09, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:28, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Jakubhal 14:43, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support This one is great. – Aristeas (talk) 08:14, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Fascinating scenery. BigDom (talk) 14:05, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2026 at 06:22:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Nectariniidae_(Sunbirds_and_Spiderhunters)
Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:22, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:22, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- 800 mm none the less, great shot with wonderful detail. --Don (talk) 07:41, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment Nice shot, but should identify as male and use it on a wiki. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:15, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you, I have done it as you suggested. Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 07:14, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Comment Nice bird, I think this could take a bit of a crop though. BigDom (talk) 08:46, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
- I cropped out some of the extra space, hope you like it better now. Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 05:50, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 07:16, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:48, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 13:52, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:27, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 05:36, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2026 at 21:31:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Palaces#China
Info Second Palace Gate, Hall of Dispelling Clouds at the Summer Palace in Beijing. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 21:31, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Ermell (talk) 21:31, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --iMahesh (talk) 02:05, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice light and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:42, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:58, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 07:15, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 09:57, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:27, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Steven Sun (talk) 14:29, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2026 at 17:28:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Models
Info Model in 1:25 scale of the Drei Annen Hohne station of the Brocken Railway in the Miniaturenpark „Kleiner Harz“, Wernigerode. In the station is a model of the Class 990244-6 narrow-gauge steam locomotive - a 1'E1' h2t tank locomotive designed for 1,000 mm gauge track - which operates on the Harz Narrow Gauge Railways. Built by Lokomotivbau Karl Marx Babelsberg in 1956, it produces approximately 700 hp (515 kW) and reaches a top speed of 40 km/h; created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 17:28, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 17:28, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 18:51, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --iMahesh (talk) 12:06, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:16, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment In thumb size, I suppose most of us will be foolled by this photo in thinking it is the real thing. But then we realize the leaves on the left are gigantic! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:46, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 20:38, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 08:19, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:57, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 09:57, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support TheNoob1337 (talk) 13:38, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:27, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 05:37, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2026 at 09:10:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info created and uploaded by Onderkokturk, nominated by Yann
Support Perfect composition in black and white with a touch of colors in the faces and gloves. -- Yann (talk) 09:10, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 10:06, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:34, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Acroterion (talk) 02:12, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:46, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Maryliflower (talk) 06:12, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Bwag (talk) 08:47, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Per Yann -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:44, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:55, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 07:14, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:23, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support TheNoob1337 (talk) 13:35, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:27, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 05:37, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 16:43, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2026 at 07:11:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Phylloscopidae_(Leaf_warblers)
Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 07:11, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 07:11, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
SupportLuc Viatour (talk) 07:19, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Signed by User:$oliton (talk) 10:45, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment You chose a different image for Wikipedia and VI... Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:19, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
- I found the display of subject is better in that frame for prefect lateral view of subject, I also nominated that image in FP but people are more concerned about resolution of image here which is not the case for VI, so I choose this image for FP. Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 07:23, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:51, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:27, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 05:37, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2026 at 04:20:13 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/People/Work#Others or perhaps Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Motorcycles
Info created by dllu – uploaded by dllu – nominated by Dllu -- dllu (talk) 04:20, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- dllu (talk) 04:20, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support strong support --Wilfredor (talk) 10:48, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 10:56, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:54, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Something different, good! You may remove the spot near the image center :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:06, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Question Why are some wheels round and some oval? --Llez (talk) 15:07, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
- The height depends on how close they are to the camera (closer = taller) and the width depends on how fast they are going (faster = narrower). Since they weren't all going at the same speed or at the same distance from the camera, I couldn't get them all to be exactly the right aspect ratio. dllu (talk) 17:00, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Thanks for the explanation --Llez (talk) 17:11, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 15:53, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support as per PantheraLeo. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:09, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:13, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:18, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Super panning effect--Basile Morin (talk) 01:47, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:51, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 09:57, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:27, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support Impressive photo even with a less-than-perfect sharpness. Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:56, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support - Maybe worth cloning out that bright spot right in the middle though. — Rhododendrites talk | 16:43, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Great Migration Mara River crossing
Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2026 at 19:23:40 (UTC)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page
-
Zebras initiate the crossing
-
The wildebeest quickly follow the zebras into the river
-
About 3000 wildbeest make the crossing
-
The herd splits into two groups and wildbeest start to descend the cliffs
-
Wildebeest rush down the steep cliff to reach the water
-
One of the last jumps down the cliff
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Genus : Connochaetes (Wildebeest)
Info The Great Migration is often described as the world's No. 1 wildlife spectacular. There are more than 10 possible places for the wildebeest to cross the Mara River. Around 500 safari vehicles struggle to be in the right place at the right time. Thank you to my guide Alpha for his expertise. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:23, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:23, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --iMahesh (talk) 02:50, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Luc Viatour (talk) 07:21, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I like especially this one very much, but this setting is arbitrary, definitely not a valid set. Poco a poco (talk) 08:10, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
- Interesting. Ever since your shark nomination went through I have struggled to understand what constitutes a set under our rules. All my images were taken in sequence from the very same place using the same camera and zoom lens. Please note that although from the FPC preview it looks as if the images are cropped to 3840×2560 pixels, none have been cropped at all. I could have made the set of any number of images, so to that extent only, the choice of 6 images is arbitrary. Let's wait and see what happens. To me the images tell a vey valuable story of an exciting eleven minutes of wildlife magic. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:11, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
- Charles, you are bringing up a nom that is older than 5 years. Obviously that nom plays no role here, but still, I will comment it. I answered you there and still stick to my argument. Criteria #3 was fulfilled. The close-up shot is maybe arguable. Yes, I could have nominated it as single FP candidate, otherwise a perfectly valid set nom. Poco a poco (talk) 12:48, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support At first glance, it seemed like a somewhat arbitrary set of photos, but after looking at it more carefully, in my humble opinion this is not just a photo set; it also works as a timeline, showing the entire process of crossing the river from beginning to end. The only thing I feel is missing is a shot of a crocodile trying to catch a wildebeest as it escapes. The theme is coherent throughout, always centered on the river crossing, while maintaining consistent lighting, framing, and visual continuity. The images also complement one another as a sequence. There also seems to have been a deliberate selection of the most important moments, and finally, there is a narrative, a story that the series is trying to convey. That said, there are some things that can and should be improved, such as the tilted horizon in the fourth shot --Wilfredor (talk) 11:32, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
- I understand no word of what you say. I can use your "explanation" to justify anything. Please, we have rules. Which criteria for a set nom is this nom supposed to fulfill? --Poco a poco (talk) 12:52, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
- I see your point. I was referring specifically to criterion #2: “a sequence of images showing the passage of time.” These photos were taken in chronological sequence from the same place during the same river crossing and show successive stages of that single event over about eleven minutes. The selection of six frames is selective, but the relationship between them is not arbitrary Wilfredor (talk) 13:44, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
- And how do the zebras match here in that sequence? We expect a sequence from a subject, and here I see zebras, than a huge group of wildbeest, then a smaller group and at the end a single one. Poco a poco (talk) 21:07, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
- The sequence is not about a particular wildebeest, nor even the wildebeest species itself; it is about this crossing of the Mara River. Zebras are therefore part of the sequence: they initiate the crossing, the wildebeest follow, the bulk of the herd passes through, and finally, the flow narrows down to smaller groups and isolated animals. That progression is what illustrates the passage of time. If the six photographs had to feature the same individuals or the same number of animals, I do not see how a sequence documenting such an event could work under criterion no. 2. The changing composition of the herd is part of what varies over the course of those eleven minutes Wilfredor (talk) 22:47, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
- The received wisdom is that wildebeest initiate the crossings. As this sequence shows (hence the high EV) this is not always the case. Zebra have better eyesight and can spot crocodiles from the high banks of the river . There were none here. At the other crossing I photographed the crossing was initiated by wildebeest. Probably a coincidence, but two were killed by crocs. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:15, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
- And how do the zebras match here in that sequence? We expect a sequence from a subject, and here I see zebras, than a huge group of wildbeest, then a smaller group and at the end a single one. Poco a poco (talk) 21:07, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
- I understand no word of what you say. I can use your "explanation" to justify anything. Please, we have rules. Which criteria for a set nom is this nom supposed to fulfill? --Poco a poco (talk) 12:52, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:26, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 16:06, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, but I can't see anything exceptional in this set. A video (or a single very good photo) would document much better the process. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:01, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2026 at 19:14:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Nebulae
Info created by Luc Viatour (talk) 19:14, 29 August 2026 (UTC)Luc Viatour (talk) 19:18, 29 August 2026 (UTC) – uploaded by Luc Viatour (talk) 19:18, 29 August 2026 (UTC) – nominated by Lviatour -- Luc Viatour (talk) 19:14, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Luc Viatour (talk) 19:14, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Excellent and beautifully detailed. The rich nebulosity, intricate dust structures and refined processing combine to create a truly striking image. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:30, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you for the praise. Luc Viatour (talk) 21:39, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --iMahesh (talk) 02:50, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 10:06, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:03, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 15:57, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:26, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:11, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 20:39, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Strong support Wow, I'm very surprised to find that this was taken with a DSLR and not a monochrome astrocam! Alnitak is super well managed here, too, which is not easy. I've taken a few liberties here: a) made the gallery more specific, and b) added a short description to the nomination. —brainandforce [yap] 02:06, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
- I've detailed the technical acquisition data. I got a cooled camera this summer; I haven't taken many photos with it yet, but the results are even better. Luc Viatour (talk) 04:52, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 10:07, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 09:58, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:27, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 05:38, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2026 at 18:48:57 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Troglodytidae_(Wrens)
Info Troglodytes troglodytes in Scotland. Common bird but what is a composition and quality! Сreated by Caroline Legg, uploaded by me. --Юрий Д.К. 18:48, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Юрий Д.К. 18:48, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:02, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- E bailey (talk) 15:53, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:10, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 08:20, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support nice --Famberhorst (talk) 04:49, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:24, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support but I would like it a bit brighter --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:53, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 09:58, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 13:53, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:27, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Comment I like it, but is the subject selectively brightened? Obviously there's a light fall-off given the dark background, but it looks like the light on the bill doesn't match the rest of the front of the bird? Maybe an illusion. — Rhododendrites talk | 16:41, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2026 at 18:25:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Acanthuridae_(Surgeonfish)
Info Pale surgeonfish (Acanthurus mata), Nosy Sakatia, Madagascar. Note: there are no FPs on Commons of the genus Acanthurus, which includes 41 species. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 18:25, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 18:25, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
SupportLuc Viatour (talk) 19:32, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 10:49, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:00, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 15:57, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:26, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 08:20, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Question High quality as usual, but is it too blue? Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:04, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
- the ocean is blue, I think so Wilfredor (talk) 01:13, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:20, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 09:58, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:27, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2026 at 17:48:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Germany
Info The erected deer sculpture in Höllental with the depth of the Höllenwald forest, created by PantheraLeo1359531 – uploaded by PantheraLeo1359531 – nominated by PantheraLeo1359531. File:Sonnenaufgang im Höllental (Frankenwald) 191220-0135-HDR.jpg was shot within the same geotope -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 17:48, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 17:48, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment Could you please tweak the exposition a bit? (Assuming that you have the RAW file.) At the first glance, it looks a bit overexposed to me. — Draceane talkcontrib. 20:38, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Like the forest view but the subject (sculpture) gets lost in the composition I think, and when you do spot it, it looks like it's trying to escape from the frame. Agree with the above comment about the exposure too. BigDom (talk) 08:42, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2026 at 15:34:20 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Printed#Posters and advertisements
Info created by Neumont, Maurice – uploaded by Mr.Nostalgic – nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 15:34, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment is a very large picture, use File:Café Biard, café 10 c la tasse, chocolat 20 c, café au lait. affiche, Maurice Neumont 1908-compressedrestored.jpg if the connection slow or is difficult to your browser or computer to open the file, this version is only to ease the downloas, a very compressed JPG, it isn't an alternate candidate --Ezarateesteban 15:34, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Ezarateesteban 15:34, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:25, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 09:58, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2026 at 08:31:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Palaces#Thailand
Info created, uploaded & nominated by iMahesh (talk) 08:31, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- iMahesh (talk) 08:31, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ezarateesteban 15:36, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 08:43, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 10:07, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 10:58, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 14:57, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:08, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:27, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2026 at 06:55:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Exteriors#Landscapes
Info Painting created by Jean-Victor Bertin – Photograph created by JackyM59 – uploaded by JackyM59 – nominated by JackyM59 -- JackyM59 (talk) 06:55, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- JackyM59 (talk) 06:55, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
SupportLuc Viatour (talk) 08:03, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 08:43, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 14:57, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:07, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Support ★ 03:15, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:46, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:54, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:27, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
File:Nankai 50000 series Rapit cars 50703 50203 Imamiyaebisu Station Osaka line scan dllu.jpg, featured
Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2026 at 05:15:18 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Rail vehicles#Japan
Info created by dllu – uploaded by dllu – nominated by Dllu -- dllu (talk) 05:15, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- dllu (talk) 05:15, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
Support A great rendition, which I personally prefer over your previous version. The improved detail in the wheels and undercarriage creates a much better balance; these areas felt somewhat too dark in the earlier version. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:40, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 08:42, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 11:00, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:55, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 14:56, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support This is much better than the first version. Acroterion (talk) 02:15, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:06, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 22:41, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Steven Sun (talk) 13:47, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:27, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2026 at 15:22:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments and memorials
Info created by Cvmontuy – uploaded by Cvmontuy – nominated by Cvmontuy -- Cvmontuy (talk) 15:22, 28 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Cvmontuy (talk) 15:22, 28 August 2026 (UTC)
Support I see wow here Poco a poco (talk) 12:59, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment The tower appears wider at the top than at the bottom.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:35, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Steven Sun (talk) 13:47, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:26, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Image quality is on the poor side, composition is not convincing. Atmospheric conditions are not the best. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:02, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2026 at 15:16:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Jetties and piers
Info Harbor entrance on the island of Wangerooge, Lower Saxony, Germany. All by me. --Milseburg (talk) 15:16, 28 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 15:16, 28 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:57, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:32, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:25, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Contrast between horizontal clouds/horizon and the projection mole is pleasing. Good clouds in general. Acroterion (talk) 02:14, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:01, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 20:57, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 13:54, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:26, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2026 at 16:54:08 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info created by TAPAS KUMAR HALDER – uploaded by TAPAS KUMAR HALDER – nominated by Moheen -- Moheen (keep talking) 16:54, 27 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Moheen (keep talking) 16:54, 27 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment A noble message but definitely feels gimmicky. I think this is staged? —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 17:34, 27 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Rasel Hasan Talk 21:10, 27 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:44, 28 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:32, 28 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:55, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:58, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 20:58, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:26, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2026 at 16:32:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Portraits, paintings of males
Info created by unknown Ming artist – uploaded by Kcx36 – nominated by Min968 -- Min968 (talk) 16:32, 27 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Min968 (talk) 16:32, 27 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Luc Viatour (talk) 17:33, 27 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 12:19, 28 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:24, 28 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:37, 28 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:54, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:57, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:26, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2026 at 09:04:26 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Palaces#France
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 09:04, 27 August 2026 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 09:04, 27 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Rasel Hasan Talk 21:08, 27 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 15:31, 28 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:24, 28 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:53, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:26, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Not the best light. WHy not wait for better conditions? -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:06, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2026 at 08:57:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Palaces#France
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 08:57, 27 August 2026 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 08:57, 27 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Good enough from kit lens. Mile (talk) 12:56, 27 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:24, 28 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 06:57, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Luc Viatour (talk) 08:08, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:52, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:30, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:56, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:26, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2026 at 04:35:30 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Netherlands
Info Monumental head-neck-trunk farm from 1837 Ayttawei 2, Reduzum. (detail). This photo of a detail of a monumental head-neck-body farmhouse from 1837 shows that a great deal still needs to be done to restore the farmhouse to its former glory.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:35, 27 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:35, 27 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Rasel Hasan Talk 21:09, 27 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:23, 28 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose An old farm but nothing I would call extraordinary in terms of composition, light or subject, photographically. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:37, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 06:57, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per Basile. Yann (talk) 17:56, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
Neutral Maybe if the photo had been taken from the front but the cut of the roof doesn't convince me. --Wilfredor (talk) 18:21, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you for your comment. I can show more of the roof if needed.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:28, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
- I took a while to reply because I’m not sure if adding the roof changes the composition enough to make it a Featured Photo; perhaps a head-on shot—like I mentioned—would yield a different result. But don't rely too much on what other users say; instead, follow your heart. Wilfredor (talk) 12:37, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oke, bedankt.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:34, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you for your comment. I can show more of the roof if needed.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:28, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, I'm with Basile Poco a poco (talk) 13:09, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2026 at 02:09:56 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Work#Female singers
Info created by Fuad Al-Qrize – uploaded by Mr.FarFar – nominated by Mr.FarFar -- Mr.FarFar (talk) 02:09, 27 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Mr.FarFar (talk) 02:09, 27 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Great portrait. --Yann (talk) 17:38, 28 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:28, 28 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:52, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support ★ 03:11, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2026 at 10:58:45 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida#Family : Lycosidae (Wolf Spiders)
Info created and uploaded by Roy Egloff – nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 10:58, 26 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 10:58, 26 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Luc Viatour (talk) 11:04, 26 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:38, 26 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Too tight crop, probably fixable. Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:21, 26 August 2026 (UTC)
Support maar per Alvesgaspar.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:25, 27 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:03, 27 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Berthold Werner (talk) 14:37, 27 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:16, 28 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Cvmontuy (talk) 15:33, 28 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 17:56, 28 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- E bailey (talk) 19:31, 28 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:36, 28 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Impressive view and level of detail at full size -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:40, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:50, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Weak support I agree that the crop is tight but wow! Poco a poco (talk) 13:12, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Support The crop is OK for my taste. Also adds some dramatic effect :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 17:03, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2026 at 00:36:38 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Other portraits of males
Info created by 004bvan – uploaded by 004bvan – nominated by 004bvan -- 004bvan (talk) 00:36, 26 August 2026 (UTC)
Support As creator and nominator. -- 004bvan (talk) 00:36, 26 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment Because the author of the drawing is still alive, I wonder if this image should be allowed in Commons. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:58, 26 August 2026 (UTC)- @Alvesgaspar: The copyright holder has explicitly released this work under a free license. You can verify this on the file description page, which features an approved VRT permission ticket (Ticket #2026081910000741) confirming the author's consent for publication. Thank you! --004bvan (talk) 12:08, 26 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Mohreza09 (talk) 00:10, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2026 at 16:13:08 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Genus : Vulpes (True Foxes)
Info Wild Arctic fox in Iceland. Created by Unsplash user Jonatan Pie – uploaded by Fæ – nominated by LetmeEditit -- LetmeEditit (talk) 16:13, 25 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- LetmeEditit (talk) 16:13, 25 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Luc Viatour (talk) 17:33, 25 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment
Out of focus --Wilfredor (talk) 21:23, 27 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Blurry -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:43, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
- Fair enough, but it's almost impossible to get a photo of a wild animal which isn't blurry. I was actually amazed at how it wasn't more blurry LetmeEditit (talk) 10:24, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
- Sorry but the exposure time 1/100s is clear too slow for this long focal length. You could also have increased the depth of field. See Category:Featured pictures by Giles Laurent and Category:Featured pictures by Charlesjsharp, for wild animals, all very sharp -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:42, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
Support TheNoob1337 (talk) 12:48, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Sat 29 Aug → Thu 03 Sep Sun 30 Aug → Fri 04 Sep Mon 31 Aug → Sat 05 Sep Tue 01 Sep → Sun 06 Sep Wed 02 Sep → Mon 07 Sep Thu 03 Sep → Tue 08 Sep
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Tue 25 Aug → Thu 03 Sep Wed 26 Aug → Fri 04 Sep Thu 27 Aug → Sat 05 Sep Fri 28 Aug → Sun 06 Sep Sat 29 Aug → Mon 07 Sep Sun 30 Aug → Tue 08 Sep Mon 31 Aug → Wed 09 Sep Tue 01 Sep → Thu 10 Sep Wed 02 Sep → Fri 11 Sep Thu 03 Sep → Sat 12 Sep
Closing nominations manually
The following description explains how to close nominations manually. Normally this is not necessary, as FPCBot takes care of counting the votes, closing and archiving the nominations. When the Bot has counted the votes, a user needs to check and approve the result; everything else is done by the Bot. Therefore, the following instructions are normally only needed for delist-and-replace nominations that the Bot cannot (yet) process, and in case the Bot malfunctions. The closing can be done by any experienced user. If you need help, just ask on the FPC talk page.
Closing a featured picture nomination
- On Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the nomination, then [edit].
- Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=(“yes” or “no”)|gallery=xxx|sig=~~~~}}
(You can leave thegalleryparameter blank if the image was not featured. If the nomination contains alternatives, you must add thealternative=xxxparameter with the name of the selected image between thegalleryand thesigparameter. See {{FPC-results-reviewed}} for examples and more explanations.) - Edit the title of the nomination and add
featuredornot featuredafter the link – for example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Add the picture to the appropriate featured picture gallery page and section. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images on Commons:Featured pictures, list to find the gallery page, and search for the correct section. (An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.)
- Add the template
{{Assessments|featured=1}}to the image description page.- If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the
com-nomparameter. For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted in the nominationCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use{{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}You also need thecom-nomparameter if the image gets renamed. - If the image is already featured on another Wikipedia, just add
featured=1to the {{Assessments}} template. For instance,{{Assessments|enwiki=1}}becomes{{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the
- Head over to the structured data for the image and add the “Commons quality assessment” claim (P6731) “Wikimedia Commons featured picture” (Q63348049).
- Add the picture to the chronological archives of featured pictures. Place it at the end of the gallery using this format:
File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Title'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]<br> {{s|xxx}}, {{o|xxx}}, {{n|xxx}}- The
#should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other entries on that page for examples. (If you want to do everything perfectly, link that number to the nomination subpage, just like FPCBot does this. It allows users to jump directly to the nomination.) - The
Titleshould be replaced by the bare name of the featured picture, without the ‘File:’ or the file extension (such as .jpg .tif .svg). - The
xin{{s|x}}, {{o|x}}, {{n|x}}should be replaced by the count of support, oppose, and neutral votes respectively. - If the nomination was a set nomination, use this format:
File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Set: Title (Z files)'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]<br> {{s|x}}, {{o|x}}, {{n|x}}
Replace theZin(Z files)by the count of images in the set, and use the name of the first image from the set instead ofFile:xxxxx.jpgand for the title.
- The
- Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the nominator. For set nominations, use:== Set Promoted to FP ==, using the names of the set files instead of the XXXXXX and the title of the set instead of YYYYY.
<gallery>
File:XXXXXX.jpg
File:XXXXXX.jpg
</gallery>
{{FPpromotionSet2|YYYYY}} - Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedUploader|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the user who has uploaded the image, if that user is not the same as the nominator. - Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedCreator|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the creator, if the author is a different Commons user than nominator and uploader.
- Add candidate archive categories to the nomination so that people can easily find and evaluate past nominations (this applies also to unsuccessful, {{FPX}}-d, {{FPD}}-d and {{Withdraw}}-n nominations). It’s best practice to wrap all these categories in a
<noinclude>...</noinclude>section because they apply only to the nomination itself, not to the log page etc. which transclude it. You need three or four categories:- A category for the month and year, like Category:September 2026 featured picture candidates for the current month.
- A category for the type and result of the nomination, like Category:2026 successful candidates for featured picture status; replace “successful” by “unsuccessful”, “FPXed”, “FPDed” or “withdrawn”, depending on the final result of the nomination (see the supercategory for common values).
- A category for the subject of the nomination, like Category:2026 featured picture candidates of plants. Replace “plants” by one of the possible subject keywords like “animals”, “architecture”, etc.; see the base category for all common keywords. Basically the subject keywords correspond to the first part of the gallery link.
- If the nomination is a set nomination, add Category:2026 featured picture set nominations.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}-d, {{FPD}}-d and {{Withdraw}}-n nominations), you have to move the transclusion (the {{ }} and the text within those) of the nomination to the current log page.
- To find the current log page, visit the first page of the log for this month. If the header of that page contains a link with the text “Next part of this month”, the log for this month has been split into several parts because it contains too many entries. Click on the “Next part …” link and repeat this until you reach a page where the header does not offer a “Next part …” link; that’s the last and current log page.
- Now open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you are closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}or:{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/XXXXX}}. - Copy that line to the bottom of the current log page and save that page. Then remove the same line from the candidate list and save that page.
Closing a delisting nomination
- On Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):{{FPC-delist-results-reviewed|delist=x|keep=x|neutral=x|delisted=yes/no|sig=~~~~}}
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Ensifera ensifera (22271195865).jpg) - Edit the title of the delisting nomination and add
delistedornot delistedafter the image title; for example:=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Add candidate archive categories to the nomination; this works the same way as described above for featured picture nominations. The only difference is that the category for type and status must be of the form Category:2026 successful candidates for delisting from featured picture status, or Category:2026 successful candidates for delisting and replacing featured pictures if this is a delist-and-replace nomination. Substitute “unsuccessful”, “FPXed”, “FPDed” or “withdrawn” for “successful”, depending on the final result of the nomination.
- Move the transclusion of the nomination to the current log page; please see above for an explanation how to find the current log page and how to move the nomination to it.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- In the {{Assessments}} template on the image description page, change
featured=1tofeatured=2(do not remove the {{Assessments}} template; do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes). If the image description page uses the old {{Featured picture}} template, replace it with{{Assessments|featured=2}}. - Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris); but not from categories about featured pictures on specific Wikipedia editions, like Category:Featured pictures on Wikipedia, English.
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" (Q63348049) from the picture's Structured data.
- In the {{Assessments}} template on the image description page, change
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in the chronological archive of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1–6) with (1–6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture must not be removed from the chronological archives.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the section above. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Archiving a withdrawn nomination
If a nomination has been withdrawn by the nominator by using {{Withdraw}} or is cancelled with {{FPX}} or {{FPD}}, wait 24 hours after the nomination was last edited. If there has been no objection to the cancellation within this time, the nomination can simply be archived. Just add candidate archive categories to the nomination itself, then move the transclusion of the nomination to the current log page; please see above for an explanation how to find the current log page and how to move the nomination to it.
