Jump to content

User talk:Doc James

Add topic
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Latest comment: 9 days ago by ~2026-46270-97 in topic File:Neuroma de Morton.jpg

"Maps showing <year>"

[edit]

Hey Doc, this map does not show anything about the year 1963, just OWID's current lack of data in 2025. Don't you think the {{Map showing old data|year=1963}}-Template should be removed from the file, as well as the [[category:Maps showing 1963]]-Category?

As a replacement, I have already prepared Maps showing no data, I think that this should get assigned to all similar placeholder-maps that just do not display any data (yet). I think the category could be renamed as either "OWID-maps showing no data" or "Our World in Data maps showing no data"; but I can also imagine other dataless maps from other sources. There are enough uploads about OWID already that we will need to create "Maps of North America showing no data" and so on - so I think we should not make overly long names.

Finally, none your maps are products from their time; for example this map was not created in 1826. In the Commons' map naming scheme, "<time> maps of <location>" are reserved for maps from <time>. As of right now, we do not have a too-great category system for history maps, but there is Maps of North America in the 19th century, for example, which will need expansion. Once there is enough content, I think we would create subcategories like Maps of North America in the 1820s, and so on.

All the best, --Enyavar (talk) 16:47, 30 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

In regards to your third paragraph, Commons categorization is currently so that <year> maps of <location> is for maps of <location> showing data as of or for that year. Especially for older maps, year of data equals year of map made. Especially for newer maps, categorizing by year made makes little sense for example as maps get updated via new revisions. What you are talking about is located at Category:Maps by year created. Prototyperspective (talk) 18:27, 30 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Hey Enyavar, will look at building that functionality (blank maps) into the graph viewer. Right now we still need them or the interactive graphs will break. I am not; however, sure how hard it will be to build. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:08, 30 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Prototyperspective: , I had to do a bit of searching but I admit I have come up emptyhanded. Apparently you refer to this CfD from 2014? Well, essentially nothing has been done on that front since then, but we do have an established practice to differentiate between the two ideas nevertheless: "<year> maps" are a subcategory of "<year> works", "<year> in geography" and most importantly of "Old maps", and that means categorization follows TFOMC, which is a guidance template from 2006. Categorization of maps by year (sadly) got out of control after 2019, and practically in just one direction: by now, "<year> maps" have become essentially synonymous with "Maps created in <year>" - just look at 1780 maps. Following the TFOMC-template, "History maps" on the other hand were few enough that they mostly just accumulated in "history-of"-categories without ever getting subdivided by years. Some others and me only made a push in the last two years to create more and more "maps showing <year>", while "Maps by year created" looks pretty much empty to me. Right now it seems easier to just change the Template:MapsYear to specify that it means creation year.
Do you think this merits a VP-proposal? --Enyavar (talk) 21:42, 30 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
I was mainly describing the current use and understanding of these categories. by now, "<year> maps" have become essentially synonymous with "Maps created in <year>" Not at all; you are talking about what I referred to with "Especially for older maps, year of data equals year of map made" but this is very different for newer maps. If you change something like that, you'd be responsible to make sure the categories contents match their title and the formalized distinction but keep in mind that people upload new revisions of data visualization maps and the cat would need to be set to the year the last revision map was created. If you don't want to do that or can't, then don't do it. Prototyperspective (talk) 23:33, 30 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Happy Holidays!

[edit]

Matrix(!) ping onewhen replying {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 12:18, 24 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Matrix. The same to you. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:31, 24 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

files showing identical curve

[edit]

Hi Doc James, 2 days ago you have uploaded a number of files showing Population growth rate, which all seem to show the same curve and therefore have been recognized by OptimusPrimeBot as duplicates of File:Population growth rate, 1700 to 2100, ARE.svg and been tagged accordingly, see Category:Duplicate. Only after deleting a number of them, I recognized this. Was the upload of the identical curve in different files intentional or just an error? Shall the remaining also be deleted?--Túrelio (talk) 09:33, 7 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for bringing this to my attention. Appears the upload tool is not working properly as this should be the population growth of the individual countries which of course are not the same. Will get our programmer to look at it. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 09:38, 7 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
PS please do not delete the duplicates until our programmer can look at it so they know the issue. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 09:39, 7 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Ok. I've left a note to my admin-colleagues in the dupe-cat. --Túrelio (talk) 09:53, 7 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. Plan is to fix the upload tool and than reupload replacing the incorrect line graphs with the correct ones. Hopefully in a few days. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:38, 7 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Note: my bot makes sure to not flag more than 190 duplicates at the same time to not overload admins. With currently 179 SVG files staying in the category for a long time, its checks are almost disabled. vip (talk) 20:49, 18 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
The programmer of the upload tool is working on a fix. It is not done yet. They say soon. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:55, 18 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
OK thank you :) vip (talk) 09:35, 19 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi Doc James, it seems the same problem just started with File:Indian rhinos, Asia, 1966.svg etc., which are identical to File:Indian rhinos, World, 1966.svg and accordingly tagged by OptimusPrimeBot as duplicates. And how about a solution for the population growth-curve-images? They are clogging our dupe-category.--Túrelio (talk) 09:34, 23 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

From what I understand the fix has been rolled out. I just need to do the reupload to see if it works. Hopefully in the next 8 hours.
The indian rhino case is going to require further updates which we will look at. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 09:41, 23 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Unfortunately the software fix did not work. Asking our programmer to try again. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:52, 23 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
User:Túrelio and User:Don-vip that one issue appears mostly fixed. Does the warning template need to be manually removed or will a bot take care of it? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 05:41, 24 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
I've tried as an example with File:Population growth rate, 1700 to 2100, KIR.svg by manually removing the duplicate-template, which had been added by our OptimusPrimeBot. However, the file is still really a duplicate of File:Population growth rate, 1700 to 2100, FSM.svg, as shown on the description-page in the section "file usage". For both files you had uploaded a new file-version of february 23rd.--Túrelio (talk) 08:08, 25 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Yes was unable to fix those two. Can you please delete those two? Thanks Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 08:28, 25 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 09:54, 25 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Doc James can you please take a look at Special:ListDuplicatedFiles and see if all your listed files there are known issues? I'm not sure if you're aware of all the "Crude death rate the share of the population that dies per year" duplicate files created only two days ago and not yet reported by my bot. vip (talk) 14:24, 28 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks Vip. Okay yah I see we are having issues uploading the explorer graphs. This is a different issue and will get it fixed.
By the way should we redirect the "world" maps to the "asia" ones? Or simple delete the "world" maps. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 14:53, 28 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hi, it seems the same problem as previously has now happened with the cruve-series "Trade openness in europe" and "Crude death rate the share of the population that dies per year", which now clog our Category:Duplicate. --Túrelio (talk) 09:47, 2 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Yah, we just did another update now. Do you want us to simply redirect the world to the Europe maps? Or delete the world maps? I would need to have deletion ability to do the later.
This issue has to do with a graph only containing data for a single region of the world. There are a couple of these. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 09:53, 2 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
I can process the already dupe-tagged files. However, the question is into which direction? Europe -> World or the other way round?
Wrt future uploads: if the issue is identified, then the uploading bot should be programed to check this before upload and then refrain from uploading files with identical content (wrt the file itself, not the description). --Túrelio (talk) 10:01, 2 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
I say world should go to Europe as these set are for Europe and for these set the World should go to Asia as these are all about Asia / the map is of Asia.
Yes agree and have asked for the tool to "refrain from uploading files with identical content" Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 10:11, 2 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

I've now processed all dupe-tagged "Trade openness in .." files (World -> Europe). Only around 20 "crude death rate .." files are remaining in the dupe-category. --Túrelio (talk) 07:52, 3 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Perfect thanks Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:22, 3 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

File:PregnancyinCrossSection.jpg

[edit]
File:PregnancyinCrossSection.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JayCubby (talk) 23:27, 28 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Maps showing naming convention

[edit]

Separate from above, it seems like categories like Category:Maps showing Jan 2, 2022 would be better organized as Category:Maps showing 2022-01-02 under the naming convention at Category:Maps by day shown and its subcategories. Ricky81682 (talk) 22:52, 17 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Okay thanks. Will adjust eventually. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:14, 18 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
I am going to create them, move them with a category redirect and make a bot request to move the current ones. Just wanted to know if you thought differently but if we're in agreement, then we can start having them organized. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:54, 18 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
If you also remove the template and name accordingly, everything gets sorted like at Category:Maps showing 2022-03-31 which I think is more helpful to everyone. Ricky81682 (talk) 09:09, 18 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Okay sounds good. When more build up we can just do another bot run to move them I image? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:28, 18 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
For future edits, I created template:continent map showing old data which moves them into the correct continent category like this. I agree that a bot could run through the old continents first to reduce the run through the maps. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:03, 21 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Categories

[edit]

When you upload those many, many maps (which are useful), and include category tags (which are also useful), it would be helpful if you could also make sure to create the categories. You've been flooding Special:WantedCategories. DS (talk) 15:34, 27 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Can get a bot to do it eventually. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:54, 27 April 2026 (UTC)Reply


Massive erroneous changes

[edit]

This account has made thousands of changes on 15 May, that appear to be erroneous. Example: changing File:20230604 Gun death rates related to household gun ownership rates - by state - US.svg to File:Death_rate_from_suicides,_CAN.svg etc. etc. Can you or someone correct this? RCraig09 (talk) 05:35, 15 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for picking it up. Not sure what happened. Will try to fix. I see one erroneous edit. Do you see others? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 07:37, 15 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Tried to fix but get an API error. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 07:39, 15 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Okay fixed now... Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:53, 16 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

I've discovered changes to File:20230604 Gun death rates related to household gun ownership rates - by state - US.svg after you said you had fixed the problem. This kluge is very frustrating, as I can't simply return the file to its exact original name. Can you simply stop using that tool? RCraig09 (talk) 18:27, 21 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

will need to look https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:20230604_Gun_death_rates_related_to_household_gun_ownership_rates_-_by_state_-_USA.svg
Thanks User:RCraig09. Yes need to do more testing. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:06, 23 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

We have two files that are different and need to stay separate. Will test the tool again but verify afterwards that this issue does not occur again.

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:10, 23 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Roger that. The second file is human-user-generated (by me) and should not be changed, as it has nothing to do with OWID. Fixing the tool looks like a massive, complicated effort. Thanks for trying to fix. RCraig09 (talk) 17:28, 23 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Our World In Data files

[edit]

Hi, please check all the "i" files from Our World In Data currently in Category:Duplicate, e.g. File:Daily meat consumption per person, SSD.svg … I guess deletion is unwanted. ~2026-29222-97 (talk) 14:28, 16 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks will work on fixing Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:37, 17 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

File moves

[edit]

Can you please explain redirecting "File:Consent-based and coercion-based sexual violence legislation world map.svg" and "File:Death rates substance disorders, COM.svg" to "File:Average per capita vegetable intake vs minimum recommended guidelines, SOM.svg"? - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 21:31, 17 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Working to fix this. Was an error with the upload tool. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:48, 18 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
"File:Women married by age 15, COM.svg" also redirects there, by the way. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 07:03, 18 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
The tool is now fixed. Just need to reupload the broken interactive graphs. Will take me some time. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:40, 18 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Okay blanked the incorrect redirects. Let me know if you see further issues. This has been a complicated effort with multiple moving parts. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:18, 18 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

"File:Consent-based and coercion-based sexual violence legislation world map.svg" still redirects to the vegetable chart. It's in use on enwiki, so we're gonna need it back. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 03:34, 19 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Not sure where the original file went. User:Túrelio can you help restore this? https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=File%3AConsent-based+and+coercion-based+sexual+violence+legislation+world+map.svg
Appears it may have been deleted here https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=File%3AWomen+married+by+age+15%2C+COM.svg Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:45, 19 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
We have two Wikis using the incorrect file https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Average_per_capita_vegetable_intake_vs_minimum_recommended_guidelines,_SOM.svg Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 07:05, 19 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

It was clearly deleted in error. I've requested undeletion. Can you re-upload any of these? - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 08:16, 19 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Reupload which? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 09:14, 19 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Discussed here [2] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 10:16, 19 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

File:Cumulative co emissions, North America, 1783.svg

[edit]
File:Cumulative co emissions, North America, 1783.svg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Spiderphotos (talk) 18:36, 9 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

How do I make the World Bank income groups from 1987-2025?

[edit]

How do I make the World Bank income groups show data for all regions from 1987 to 2025 properly? MonicasHouse (talk) 10:35, 5 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Link to mediafile please Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 13:20, 5 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Show me the link. MonicasHouse (talk) 10:52, 10 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
@MonicasHouse: I did a Google search. Is this the file you are speaking of?
OWID/World bank income groups
--Timeshifter (talk) 03:37, 11 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
User:MonicasHouse I am not sure what you are wanting. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:26, 13 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
To make it show the world and all continents from the world bank data from 2025. MonicasHouse (talk) 23:28, 13 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Not sure what you want. Are you wanting 2025 data added? Because before it only went up to 2024? https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/world-bank-income-groups Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:15, 14 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Okay updating https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:World_bank_income_groups,_World,_2025.svg What tool were you using to upload these graphs? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:31, 14 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
It will take some time before the fixes make their way through. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:50, 14 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Question about map of internet users

[edit]

Hi! I'm using the helpful visualization at File:Number of internet users, Africa, 2021.svg in an article (en:AFRINIC), and I noticed that the image doesn't quite match the 2021 map at https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/number-of-internet-users?tab=map. The Commons version shows Nigeria with a darker orange color reflecting the 100-300M range, but the website lists Nigeria at 77.6M, with the lighter orange color reflecting the 30-100M range. Does the Commons version need to be updated?

Also, just a nice-to-have: I'd encourage creating more subcategories within Category:Our World in Data maps of Africa by topic, such as "Our World in Data maps about Internet in Africa", so that I could easily make that into a subcategory of Category:Internet in Africa. I know I can recategorize myself, but I figure you have tools/scripts and might be able to work this in when you do revisions at some point.

Thank you! Dreamyshade (talk) 20:48, 9 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Yes I see that. Let me try updating to see if that fixes this issue. I wonder if OWID updated their underlying data. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:29, 13 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
User:Dreamyshade yup updating has fixed the issue. Let me know if you see further issues.
With respect to categories. Add more by bot is complicated and is likely just as easy manually. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:52, 13 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

How to find source page

[edit]

About: OWID/Wealth share richest 1 percent. It is currently at the top of this Wikipedia page: Distribution of wealth. I added it there today. It popped up in a Google search.

How is an interested reader/editor browsing that Wikipedia article able to get to OWID/Wealth share richest 1 percent? If this is made simple, then I believe a lot more of the OWID animations will be used in Wikipedia articles. Because then people would see the main OWID category at the bottom of the page:

Static images on Wikipedia are traced back to the source just by clicking on them. And then one can go to the categories on that file description page to find related images.

Maybe put the long Commons URL in the template itself:

{{owidslider
|start        = 2024
|list         = Template:OWID/Wealth share richest 1 percent#gallery
|location      = commons
|caption      =
|title        =
|language     =
|file         = [[File:Wealth share richest 1 percent, World, 2024 (cropped).svg|link=|thumb|upright=1.6|right|Wealth share richest 1 percent]]
|startingView = World
|source       = https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/OWID/Wealth_share_richest_1_percent
}}

--Timeshifter (talk) 01:59, 11 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hey User:Timeshifter that is an excellent idea. Will add it to the list of things to do :-) Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:33, 13 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

I would like to get just Europe to show up

[edit]

For: en:Wealth distribution in Europe. I want to put this OWID slider at the top, but with only Europe showing initially.

See "startingView" parameter explanation here:

  • en:Template:Owidslider. If I fill it in with "Europe" it means the Europe-only map shows up only after clicking on the initial world map? I suggest having the Europe-only map show up from the beginning.
{{owidslider
|start        = 2024
|list         = Template:OWID/Wealth share richest 1 percent#gallery
|location      = commons
|caption      =
|title        =
|language     =
|file         = [[File:Wealth share richest 1 percent, Europe, 2024.svg|link=|thumb|upright=1.6|right|Wealth share richest 1 percent]]
|startingView = Europe
}}

Currently have to click the initial world map to get to the Europe-only map:

Wealth share richest 1 percent

--Timeshifter (talk) 02:22, 11 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

User:Timeshifter just adjust it like this. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:35, 13 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Doc James: Thanks! Is there a page just for this Europe version at Category:Pages using gadget owidslider?
OWID/Wealth share richest 1 percent is the source you adapted.
--Timeshifter (talk) 09:40, 14 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
No, one just adapts it. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 14:18, 14 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Doc James: I see that when I change it to Europe in the region dropdown menu, then the "Media credits" link shows the correct image file page to paste into the file spot in the template. This needs to be explained everywhere. :) --Timeshifter (talk) 20:54, 14 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Help with documentation much appreciated :-) Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:13, 17 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Doc James: I started this page: Help:Interactive data graphics by Our World in Data. There is a section there on converting interactive world maps to interactive regional maps. --Timeshifter (talk) 06:16, 18 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Perfect Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 10:43, 18 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Remove "template" from the URLs for the OWID sliders on the list pages

[edit]

About Commons:List of interactive data graphics. People only need to see the pages that start with "OWID/" in order to use the OWID slider on Wikipedia. The "OWID/" pages without "template" in the URL are all that most people need to see.

The URLs with template in the name take forever to load since they contain all the component slides that make the OWID slider work.

It may be a good idea to make those template subcategories into hidden categories. In order to lower the server load, and to not annoy people endlessly waiting for all the slider images to load.

What are the numbers in the headings of the main list? Are they the number of OWIDsliders in that category? If so, I guess many need to be added to the main list, or the subtopic lists. Such as this subtopic list:

I could do a mass find-and-replace on the main list page, and on the subtopic lists, to remove "template" from the URLs for all the entries. --Timeshifter (talk) 03:59, 11 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Yah those were the numbers that OWID gave. However they are not really correct for the interactive graphs of which their are about 2,000. I have uploaded all the interactive ones except 16 here.
Agree with moving to "OWID/" and removing template links. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:38, 13 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Doc James: I think I converted them all. An edit summary:
Change to page name beginning with OWID instead of Template. Per User talk:Doc James#Remove "template" from the URLs for the OWID sliders on the list pages. Some pages do not have an OWID page, and only have a template page. They end up red-linked.
I used the source editor to do mass find-and-replace. I changed
*[[Template:
to
*[[
Seemed to cause the least problems.
The "unorganized" category had over a thousand pages:
Commons:List of interactive data graphics/Others
--Timeshifter (talk) 10:39, 14 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:13, 17 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Logging in into NCCommons

[edit]

Hi! I would like to be able to upload files NC Commons. How does that work? :) (my account is here). Thanks in advance! --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:43, 19 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Ability to edit granted. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:23, 19 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you very much :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 06:34, 21 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

File:Neuroma de Morton.jpg

[edit]
File:Neuroma de Morton.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

~2026-46270-97 (talk) 10:48, 25 August 2026 (UTC)Reply